aanstaande is, om te komen tot meer gestructureerde aandacht voor MSU in de 4,5 jaar durende specialisatie tot sportarts. Ook het inrichten van een fellowship MSU voor de sportarts zou op termijn een mogelijkheid bieden om te komen tot het instellen van een super specialisatie binnen de sportgeneeskunde. In ieder geval lijkt het verdedigbaar dat MSU een onlosmakelijke verbinding krijgt met de sportgeneeskunde en met de sportarts als specialist, zoals dit inmiddels al jaren ook het geval is voor de gynaecologen en cardiologen. Referenties 1. Introductory Guide to Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for the Rheumatologist. Bruijn GAW, Schmidt WA, Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten, the Netherlands 2006. 2. R. Kijowski, A.A. De Smet. The Role of MSU in evaluation sports medicine injuries of the upper extremity., Clin Sports Med 25(2006)569-590 3. Maas M, Pluim BM, de Jonge MC, Heijboer MP . Imaging techniques in sports medicine. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:B409 4. Multidisciplinaire evidence-based richtlijn diagnostiek en behandeling van het subacromiaal Pijnsyndroom(SAPS).Nederlandse Orthopaedische Vereniging 2013. 5. Cook JK,Purdam CR. Is tendon pathology a continuum?. A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of load-induced tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:409-416 6. Orchard J, Seward H. Epidemiology of injuries in the Australian Football League, seasons 1997–2000. Br J Sports Med 2002;36:39–44.] 7. Yard EE, Schroeder MJ, Fields SK, Collins CL, Comstock RD. The epidemiology of United States high school soccer injuries, 2005–2007. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:1798–805.] 8. Arnason A, Sigurdsson SB, Gudmundsson A, Holme I, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Risk factors for injuries in football. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:5S–16S. 9. J C Lee, A W M Mitchell, J C Healy. Imaging of muscle injury in the elite athlete Br J Radiol. 2012 August; 85(1016): 1173–1185 10. Connell DA, Schneider-Kolsky ME, Hoving JL, Malara F, Buchbinder R, Koulouris G, et al. Longitudinal study comparing sonographic and MRI assessments if healing hamstring injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:975–84. 11. Fornage BD. Soft tissue masses: the underutilization of sonography. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 1999;3:115–34. 12. Peetrons P. Echographie musculaire. Feuillets Radiolo 1990;30:217–21. 13. Peetrons P. Ultrasound of muscle. Eur Radiol 2002;12:35–43. 14. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ. l. Ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal applications. Br J Radio 2012 Nov;85(1019):1435-45. 15. Hall TJ. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in US: beyond the basics: elasticity imaging with US. Radiographics 2003;23:1657–71. 16. Garra BS. Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 2007;23:255–68. 17. Garra BS. Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you. Ultrasound Q 2011;27:177–86. 18. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991;13:111–34. 19. Huang SR, parker KJ. “Sonoelasticity” images derived from ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990;16:231–39. 20. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239:341–50. 21. Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Struve P, Pinggera G, Horninger W, Bartsch G. Real-time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience. BJU Int 2007;100:42–6. 22. Dighe M, Bae U, Richardson ML, Dubinsky TJ, Minoshima S, Kim Y. Differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules with US elastography using carotid artery pulsation. Radiology 2008;248:662–9. 23. Thomas A, Kümmel S, Gemeinhardt O, Fischer T. Real-time sonoelastography of the cervix: tissue elasticity of the normal and abnormal cervix. Acad Radiol 2007;14:193–200. 24. Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Hassan H, Gorunescu F. Analysis of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for characterization and differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes. Ultraschall Med 2006;27:535–42. 25. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Real-time ultrasound elastography of the normal Achilles tendon: reproducibility and pattern description. Clin Radiol 2009;64:1196–202. 26. De Zordo T, Chem R, Smekal V, Feuchtner G, Reindl M, Fink C. Real-time sonoelastography: findings in patients with symptomatic achilles tendons and comparison to healthy volunteers. Ultraschall Med 2010;31:394–400. 27. Pedersen M, Fredberg U, Langberg H. Sonoelastography as a diagnostic tool in the assessment of musculoskeletal alterations: a systematic review. Ultraschall Med. 2012 Oct;33(5):441-6 28. De Zordo T, Chem R, Smekal V, Feuchtner G, Reindl M, Fink C. Real-time sonoelastography: findings in patients with symptomatic achilles tendons and comparison to healthy volunteers. Ultraschall Med 2010;31:394–400. 29. De Zordo T, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Smekal V, Reindl M, Klauser AS. Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy Achilles tendons. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:W134–8. 30. Klauser AS,Faschingbauer R, Jaschke WR. Is sonoelastography of value in assessing tendons? Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2010;14:323–33. 31. Bhatia KS, Rasalkar DD, Lee YP, Wong KT, King AD, Yuen YH. Real-time qualitative ultrasound elastography of miscellaneous non-nodal neck masses: applications and limitations. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010;36:1644 32. Gilliland CA, Salazar LD, Borchers JR. Ultrasound versus anatomic guidance for intra-articular and periarticular injection: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed. 2011 Sep;39(3):121-31. nummer 2 | april 2014 | Sport & Geneeskunde 19 Pagina 18
Pagina 20Interactieve e-vakblad, deze nieuwsbrief of maandblad is levensecht online geplaatst met Online Touch en bied het online maken van digitale nieuwsbrieven.
Sport & Geneeskunde nummer 2 | April 2014 Lees publicatie 29Home